User Friendly, Clear & Articulate Evidence Based Knowledge & Practices
Contexts
Perspectives
Epistemology
Theories
Frameworks
Modes
Methodologies
Contexts
The Contexts are very important in order to use Knowledge, and validate practices. And this is what is lacking in the production of psycho-social sciences insights nowadays. Theories have become Doctrines very often utilized as Dogma. The Specific is lost into Academic jargon with pseudo-scientific clothes. There's no solid thread to bring together the commonalities of different situations in order to make sense of the disparities and come up with informed practices, for the benefit of scientifically healthy interventions. It seems as if the preoccupations of Practitioners and Clients are misinformed, and the theoreticians are king. And also, the Authentic Goals become a blur and are overlooked in the confusion of the many restrained approaches with their own ideological agency, and a diluted pragmatism ensue with mitigated results, following what the conditions of pressure are.
Perspectives
The notion that a theory can articulate a problematic and leave out details deemed not to be important, because it is necessary to carve out the major lines of discourse where supposedly operational truth will emerge is relatively passé, as the availability of Big Data, makes it possible to conceive theories that are closer and closer to realities. So it is important to include the perspectives of all stakeholders and all aspects of reality in the Theoretical Process in order to arrive at User Friendly Models with Operational Insights for day to day activities as much as the direction of programs.
Epistemology
As knowledge is being questioned, it is important that the questions are rightly placed, that they address what matters, and that the language is relevant to what's really at stake, so the necessity to explore the Contexts and Perspectives beforehand. We do understand that some problematic lends itself much more to Quantification and Induction, or Hypothetico-Deduction, or even phenomenology, or qualitative dialectic in general, or some mix following the complexity of what one is studying. So the investigator has to settle on the limitations of his/her discourse and on the adapted choice, and consider using complementary methods of discussion in order to articulate a viable comprehensive approach to what is being argued scientifically.
Theories
Theories abound, and sometimes many theories offer different approaches to understand the same phenomenon in Psycho-Social Sciences. They frame their references following different Perspectives, and new theories should take these ways of seeing things into account. And if New Frames of Reference are looking to bring about new insights, they should relate where they place themselves in the Context of the existing theories, so as to make it easier for Practitioners to understand how to use the evidence the new theories are based on. Also, by doing so, it facilitates an understanding of the phenomenon or phenomena from the lenses of different Perspectives that may find relevance with the application one is looking at, with many theories sometimes being complementary for a deeper understanding, or just adding more light.
Frameworks
Analysis of the specific phenomenon being studied requires an adapted framework and there the relevant literature review can be enlightening for this specialized purpose. The analysis is thus more meaningful as it is done in both a specific context and a previously more elaborate Larger Context. As it takes shape, the Framework of Analysis will inform other subsequent frameworks that shed light on detailed aspects of the issues being investigated. These Frameworks allow for better contextualization and user friendliness of the research to Practitioners looking to use the conclusions of the study. Applications are also facilitated because phenomena are more easily compared through these frameworks of understanding and discrimination.
Modes
It is one thing to have Frameworks, and another to consider the models, habits, habitus and practices engaged into by the stakeholders of a particular investigation in pragmatic reality, notwithstanding the potential uses of the research itself. All of this add to the ethology of the researchers themselves. These considerations have to be into account in order to make it easy for Evidence Based Knowledge and Practices to be Clear and User Friendly. The Modes will lead to informed Methodology, and clearer understanding for everyone.
Methodologies
Methodologies are, more often than not, inconclusive in the Psycho-Social Sciences, and they are always to be analyzed in context. That's why they need to be specified and their results validated by reliable considerations. Contextualization is the preeminent Mode of Veracity for any use thereof and for any applications of the results. Methodologies may be complemented not only by these analyses of the results, but also by other methods used in conjunction as it is the case with Mixed Methods. However, even then, the results have to be articulated in such a manner as to allow for caveats. All these conditions are necessary for User Friendly, Clear and Articulate Evidence Based Knowledge and Practices.
Carl Edward Nicolas
Copyrights © 2018
Contexts
Perspectives
Epistemology
Theories
Frameworks
Modes
Methodologies
Contexts
The Contexts are very important in order to use Knowledge, and validate practices. And this is what is lacking in the production of psycho-social sciences insights nowadays. Theories have become Doctrines very often utilized as Dogma. The Specific is lost into Academic jargon with pseudo-scientific clothes. There's no solid thread to bring together the commonalities of different situations in order to make sense of the disparities and come up with informed practices, for the benefit of scientifically healthy interventions. It seems as if the preoccupations of Practitioners and Clients are misinformed, and the theoreticians are king. And also, the Authentic Goals become a blur and are overlooked in the confusion of the many restrained approaches with their own ideological agency, and a diluted pragmatism ensue with mitigated results, following what the conditions of pressure are.
Perspectives
The notion that a theory can articulate a problematic and leave out details deemed not to be important, because it is necessary to carve out the major lines of discourse where supposedly operational truth will emerge is relatively passé, as the availability of Big Data, makes it possible to conceive theories that are closer and closer to realities. So it is important to include the perspectives of all stakeholders and all aspects of reality in the Theoretical Process in order to arrive at User Friendly Models with Operational Insights for day to day activities as much as the direction of programs.
Epistemology
As knowledge is being questioned, it is important that the questions are rightly placed, that they address what matters, and that the language is relevant to what's really at stake, so the necessity to explore the Contexts and Perspectives beforehand. We do understand that some problematic lends itself much more to Quantification and Induction, or Hypothetico-Deduction, or even phenomenology, or qualitative dialectic in general, or some mix following the complexity of what one is studying. So the investigator has to settle on the limitations of his/her discourse and on the adapted choice, and consider using complementary methods of discussion in order to articulate a viable comprehensive approach to what is being argued scientifically.
Theories
Theories abound, and sometimes many theories offer different approaches to understand the same phenomenon in Psycho-Social Sciences. They frame their references following different Perspectives, and new theories should take these ways of seeing things into account. And if New Frames of Reference are looking to bring about new insights, they should relate where they place themselves in the Context of the existing theories, so as to make it easier for Practitioners to understand how to use the evidence the new theories are based on. Also, by doing so, it facilitates an understanding of the phenomenon or phenomena from the lenses of different Perspectives that may find relevance with the application one is looking at, with many theories sometimes being complementary for a deeper understanding, or just adding more light.
Frameworks
Analysis of the specific phenomenon being studied requires an adapted framework and there the relevant literature review can be enlightening for this specialized purpose. The analysis is thus more meaningful as it is done in both a specific context and a previously more elaborate Larger Context. As it takes shape, the Framework of Analysis will inform other subsequent frameworks that shed light on detailed aspects of the issues being investigated. These Frameworks allow for better contextualization and user friendliness of the research to Practitioners looking to use the conclusions of the study. Applications are also facilitated because phenomena are more easily compared through these frameworks of understanding and discrimination.
Modes
It is one thing to have Frameworks, and another to consider the models, habits, habitus and practices engaged into by the stakeholders of a particular investigation in pragmatic reality, notwithstanding the potential uses of the research itself. All of this add to the ethology of the researchers themselves. These considerations have to be into account in order to make it easy for Evidence Based Knowledge and Practices to be Clear and User Friendly. The Modes will lead to informed Methodology, and clearer understanding for everyone.
Methodologies
Methodologies are, more often than not, inconclusive in the Psycho-Social Sciences, and they are always to be analyzed in context. That's why they need to be specified and their results validated by reliable considerations. Contextualization is the preeminent Mode of Veracity for any use thereof and for any applications of the results. Methodologies may be complemented not only by these analyses of the results, but also by other methods used in conjunction as it is the case with Mixed Methods. However, even then, the results have to be articulated in such a manner as to allow for caveats. All these conditions are necessary for User Friendly, Clear and Articulate Evidence Based Knowledge and Practices.
Carl Edward Nicolas
Copyrights © 2018
Perfected, Completed and Ready to go
More to the point
Here are theories I have come up with and concepts I am working on: BIo-MEntal REsources/ROUTines-Emerging/Evolving Patterns/PROcesses; NETworking PSYcho-Social Stories Synergies; Behavioral Integrative-Analysis Sciences (Bi-Me ReRoutE/Pro; NetPsychSS; B.I-A.S) Trans-Behavioral Psycho-SintegrYSc IY Science (Psycho-Social Integrationalysis Yields Science)
HiRe CoRe: HIstoricizing REhearsing COntextualizing REenacting
Epistemological Pole: Discursive Processes:
Relationships & EMOTion Enabled Social Cognition, REviewing SETtings through HIStory MEANingfulness and MINDfulness, NETworking PSYcho-Social Stories Synergies (REmotES Cognition ReSet HisMMean-HisMMind NetPsychSS)
HISTORICIZING
History
Theoretical Pole: Frames of Reference:
The ANgst Driven, PLEAsure Seeking, EMOtion & Relationships Enabled PUSH, Mixed/Movement/MOtion/MOde RElated PULL, Focus/Dis-traction NETworking PSYcho-Social Stories Synergies (AnD PleaSEmoRE Push MoRe Pull Focus/Dis-traction NetPsychSS)
Morphological Pole: The Frames of Analysis:
My breakthroughs are to be understood in the context of NETworking Socially Shared PYSCHological, EDucational, BUSiness and Institutional Stories, EXPERienced, UNDERstood, Negotiated, Expected/Emancipated, Tagged, Created, Represented, Adjusted, Minded and NURTURed through Emotional & MEntal SYNergies in APPrehension of Situations Expected and/or Simmering with the perspective of whatever tasks are at stake. A morphological/methodological stance I try to remember as NetSSPsychEd-BuSIStories-ExperUnder-NETCRAM-NurturE.Me.SynAppSES
Technical Pole: The Methods of Investigation
NETworking PSYcho-Social Stories __ Restraint & Relatedness Routines, Outreach for Adaptive Agenda Discoveries Dynamics, SYNERGies Impulsiveness Integration-Analysis __ through __ Emotions Focused Feelings Effects, Contextual Tales Symmetries & Stories __ Environmental/Educational Directions & Situations, Angst, Habits, Constraints and the Quest for Pleasure (NetPsychSS-ROADSynergIA-EFFECTSStories-EDSituAHCQuP)
Now you know I have a whole theory to back the following up. Relationships are understood to be relationships with anyone, with any things, with any situations. And Mixed/Movement/Motion/Mode understood to mean action/experience moving forward at the basis of emotion, feeling, creativity and intelligence.
Here are theories I have come up with and concepts I am working on: BIo-MEntal REsources/ROUTines-Emerging/Evolving Patterns/PROcesses; NETworking PSYcho-Social Stories Synergies; Behavioral Integrative-Analysis Sciences (Bi-Me ReRoutE/Pro; NetPsychSS; B.I-A.S) Trans-Behavioral Psycho-SintegrYSc IY Science (Psycho-Social Integrationalysis Yields Science)
HiRe CoRe: HIstoricizing REhearsing COntextualizing REenacting
Epistemological Pole: Discursive Processes:
Relationships & EMOTion Enabled Social Cognition, REviewing SETtings through HIStory MEANingfulness and MINDfulness, NETworking PSYcho-Social Stories Synergies (REmotES Cognition ReSet HisMMean-HisMMind NetPsychSS)
HISTORICIZING
History
Story
Relationships
Storied Relationships Emotion Stimuli (Thoughts)
Theoretical Pole: Frames of Reference:
The ANgst Driven, PLEAsure Seeking, EMOtion & Relationships Enabled PUSH, Mixed/Movement/MOtion/MOde RElated PULL, Focus/Dis-traction NETworking PSYcho-Social Stories Synergies (AnD PleaSEmoRE Push MoRe Pull Focus/Dis-traction NetPsychSS)
REHEARSING
Vision Task (Goals Priorities Infos Task) Mastery Control (Plan Organize Execute Evaluate)
Musical Pattern of Insights
The Checklist of Stories
Relationships Storied Emotion Stimuli (Experiences)
Morphological Pole: The Frames of Analysis:
My breakthroughs are to be understood in the context of NETworking Socially Shared PYSCHological, EDucational, BUSiness and Institutional Stories, EXPERienced, UNDERstood, Negotiated, Expected/Emancipated, Tagged, Created, Represented, Adjusted, Minded and NURTURed through Emotional & MEntal SYNergies in APPrehension of Situations Expected and/or Simmering with the perspective of whatever tasks are at stake. A morphological/methodological stance I try to remember as NetSSPsychEd-BuSIStories-ExperUnder-NETCRAM-NurturE.Me.SynAppSES
CONTEXTUALIZING
Models
Programs
Processes
Routines (Emotion Storied Relationships Stimuli)
Technical Pole: The Methods of Investigation
NETworking PSYcho-Social Stories __ Restraint & Relatedness Routines, Outreach for Adaptive Agenda Discoveries Dynamics, SYNERGies Impulsiveness Integration-Analysis __ through __ Emotions Focused Feelings Effects, Contextual Tales Symmetries & Stories __ Environmental/Educational Directions & Situations, Angst, Habits, Constraints and the Quest for Pleasure (NetPsychSS-ROADSynergIA-EFFECTSStories-EDSituAHCQuP)
REENACTING
Teleo Vitalism String Genesis
Quantum Integr-Analysis
Feeling Intelligence
Rhythmic Flow (Stimuli Storied Relationships Emotion)
Copyrights © 2017
HEGoEStAM CARE LEADS: High Expectations GOals for Educational STories in Administration of Macro/Micro Challenging Adaptive and Reactive Emerging/Evolving/Emancipatory LEArning about Dynamic Situations/Synergies
The Story in Learning/Education:
I Know Exper Connect: Interest, Knowledge, Experience, Connections
SEHACORPaP: Study, Exams, Homework, Applications, Credits, Opportunities for Research, Papers, Portfolio
Or in French EDACORPaP: Etudes, Examens, Devoirs, Applications, Credits, Opportunites pour Recherches, Papiers, Portfolio
Assessment by TWrit PPProd: Testing WRITing Project Portfolio PRODuctions
I Know Exper Connect: Interest, Knowledge, Experience, Connections
SEHACORPaP: Study, Exams, Homework, Applications, Credits, Opportunities for Research, Papers, Portfolio
Or in French EDACORPaP: Etudes, Examens, Devoirs, Applications, Credits, Opportunites pour Recherches, Papiers, Portfolio
Assessment by TWrit PPProd: Testing WRITing Project Portfolio PRODuctions
HEGoEStAM CARE LEADS: High Expectations GOals for Educational STories in Administration of Macro/Micro Challenging Adaptive and Reactive Emerging/Evolving/Emancipatory LEArning about Dynamic Situations/Synergies
CHAST PLOTS: Checklist Habits for Automatic Awareness in Storied Processes of Learning Options for Thoughts and Signposts
ReS-ThinCreaPro UnMake Institute (RElationships, Stories, THINking, CREAtivity, PROject, UNderstanding, MAKErs)
All RIGHT GROOVE Andragogy Learning: Adult Life Leverage Routines Integration Grind/Grit to Honing Talents--Growth Rationales, Organizational, Operational, Vocation Emergence/Emancipation/Evolution
Andragogy Learning
MOTTO PACTAA Learning: Meaningful and Mindful Motivation, Occasion for Trends Training & Thoughts Opportunities---Passion/Priorities Accommodated, Creative Transitioning into Assiduous Analytic Learning
Story DExpIn EngAge Learning:
Story Desire/Decision EXPosure INitiation ENGaged AGEnda Learning.
So what I am trying to suggest here and imply and insinuate is the ability of the teacher, his/her Dexterity at Spinning the Story as to Engage the student in Agenda Learning (As in Agenda Reading also) based on Desire and Decision at the basis of Motivation, and Exposure/Initiation fueling it originally.
So what I am trying to suggest here and imply and insinuate is the ability of the teacher, his/her Dexterity at Spinning the Story as to Engage the student in Agenda Learning (As in Agenda Reading also) based on Desire and Decision at the basis of Motivation, and Exposure/Initiation fueling it originally.
PRISSMA-FOCCAAL: Projects Reviews Initiatives/Integration/Inclusiveness with Sustained Subjects Mindfulness/Modulation and Awareness/Articulation--Far-reaching Focus on Organized Consciousness of Circumstances/Capabilities and Curricula for Adaptive Aptitudes/Abilities/Advanced Learning.
ELICIT: Emotional Leverage toward Insights, Criteria for Ideas and Thoughts
REIENGAGE-NATURPROS Learning :
Realistically Enabling Innate Empowering Natural Goals for Adaptability & Agenda for Growth Exponents--Naturally Accessed Thoughts Used in Reviews of Processed Reenactments Or Storied Learning (Previously: Realistic Natural Agendas: RNA-NPS: Naturally Processed Storied Learning, RNA-NPS Learning)
NETCOMS: Networks Emergence/Expansion/Emancipation/Evolution Touting Connections/Complexity/Contextualization /Comprehension Opportunities for Meaning/Mindfulness and Significance
CAPTIVHATE: Comprehensive Approach Pertaining to Total Initiative, and Inspiration for Voluntary Holistic Agenda Awareness of Tasks Enablers->
Learning for WHOle Understanding Modulation: CAPTIVHATE Learning for WhoUM
HUNCH EX-TREMES:
Honing Understandings and Nurturing Comprehension History
EXpectations/ EXperiential Transition/Training Review, Emerging/ Embedded MEANINGS/MODULES for Evolving Sciences/ Schemas/ Scripts/ Situations/ Simulations/ Services/ Skills/ Solutions/ Standards/ Synergies
Carl Edward Nicolas
Copyrights © 2017
Carl Edward Nicolas,
Trans-Behavioral Psycho-SIntegrYSt IY Scientist (Psycho-Social Integrationalysis Yields Science)
Specializations and Research during PhD Studies:
Trans-Behavioral Psycho-SIntegrYSt IY Scientist (Psycho-Social Integrationalysis Yields Science)
Specializations and Research during PhD Studies:
Psychology (Integrative Psycho-Dynamics:Language/
Education (Prim./Sec./Voc./Adult & Higher Ed. Individual/Collective Agency Processes; Psycho-Socio-Cognitive Networking, Meta-Cognition, Self-Refulation & Dynamic Learning Styles; Talent & Human Resources Development, Educational administration)
Business Management and Public Policy (Organizational Learning/ Team Dynamics/ Change/ Development Leadership, Knowledge Management, Strategy Dynamics/ Entrepreneurship/ Group Management/ Marketing-Advertising, Project Management; Emergent/Interdependent/
(Epistemology & Methodologies: INTERDISCIPLINARY & SYSTEMIC RESEARCH, Theoretical Integration & Mental Modeling, Knowledge Development, INTELLIGENCE & HEALTH, Conflicts Resolution & Negotiation, Behavior & Administration Policy, Project Development)
Comments
Post a Comment